![how to date boss pedals how to date boss pedals](https://www.musoscorner.com.au/media/catalog/product/cache/1/image/2000x2000/9df78eab33525d08d6e5fb8d27136e95/s/y/sy-1_angle_gal.jpg)
Counter-clockwise it will sound softer, it will work with chords and held notes better.
![how to date boss pedals how to date boss pedals](https://www.johnsmusic.in/uploads/johns-music/products/dd3a-681386_l.jpg)
Once I like the amount of squash, I set the attack. I'm listening for overall "thickness" and how consistent my playing dynamics are while I dial it in. Please don't feel ripped off because you bought the pedal and it "only sounds good with 10% on the control, why bother." This really is not a pedal to dime any controls on. I use a buffer pedal to set a consistent level into my pedalboard. The CS-3 has a relatively low threshold, you may need a lower input volume on humbucker guitars. That is my nightmare.Controls at noon, set the Sustain level. That super annoying "sits on top of the guitar tone" fizzy effect that you can't un-hear. In comparison, the CE-3/PH-3/BF-3 are total junk, in my humble opinion. Oh and of course he replaced the led's with blue LED's, lol. Maybe that was just the re-cap, I honestly don't know. I'm not sure what else he did, if anything, but it made them way richer and cleaner vs. There are also some trim pots inside that I believe he tweaked by ear. older 12 volt ACA (my understanding is ACA immediately just drops it down to 9v internally anyway). I think all he did was recap them, and modded the power supply to work on modern Boss 9v PSA-style adapters vs. Holy cow, he really dramatically improved all three of them.
How to date boss pedals mods#
He didn't advertise mods for these, but said he had worked on them a bunch as he personally liked them and owned a lot of them. I sent them to Robert Keeley for a recap and service, way back when he still did this kind of thing. I wasn't necessarily disappointed, but did feel that the highest quality modern stuff had surpassed it. When I first got them bone-stock, they were obviously good quality and MUCH better than their modern counterparts (PH-3, CE-3, BF-3), but a little dull honestly. YouTube has at least a couple of reasonably good, half decent comparisons between MIJ/MIT CE-2's and the CE-3 as well. Other than that, you'll be splitting very thin hairs, at best. This may explain in part why people on a first glance tend to think that the CE-2 is better.įor those looking forward to get any of these classic chorus pedals, just get the best looking unit you can find, because how they look will be about the only real difference between them. Also, the CE-3 and CE-2 levels must be matched, as the CE-2 will sound louder by design. Poor monitoring would be certainly just the beginning of the issue. I don't know where people get those ideas. It is so untrue that the CE-3 sounds "metalic", "thin" or any worse than a CE-2 as the internet rumor goes, that I can't even begin to imagine what big difference there can be between MIJ/MIT CE-2 units. The knobs on the CE-2 and the CE-3 react differently, but by adjusting the levels and settings carefully both pedals can be made to sound exactly the same. I'll tell you, on my KRK VXT6 studio monitors there is absolutely no significant difference between the CE-2 and the CE-3. Today I compared a MIT BOSS CE-2 with a MIJ BOSS CE-3 that I already had, extensively.Īm Deluxe Strat -» Boss CE-2 -» Boss CE-3 -» Avalon V5 Preamp -» TC Electronics Impact Twin -» KRK VXT6 Studio Monitors.